<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Blogger Slams Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Because being mad is all the rage. A personal weblog of Darren Paul Griffith.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Actually, this blog was powered by Blogger for the first two years, but I ran a script that would suck the entries off of its blogspot.com location and place them on a different server---one that was accessible from China. I did this purposely so my Chinese friends could read it. 

I&#039;m finding that WordPress is a much more powerful and convenient blogging tool than Blogger. And convenience means that I make entries more often. I am really happy with WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, this blog was powered by Blogger for the first two years, but I ran a script that would suck the entries off of its blogspot.com location and place them on a different server&#8212;one that was accessible from China. I did this purposely so my Chinese friends could read it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m finding that WordPress is a much more powerful and convenient blogging tool than Blogger. And convenience means that I make entries more often. I am really happy with WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 08:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Good thing you chose WordPress then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing you chose WordPress then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>No, I wasn&#039;t aware of that. Thanks. This is in addition to all of blogspot.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I wasn&#8217;t aware of that. Thanks. This is in addition to all of blogspot.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Darren, 

I assume you have seen (or are aware of) Rebecca MacKinnon&#039;s post on how China has blocked all Typepad blogs...

For more see http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2005/06/confirmed_all_t.html

Cheers,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, </p>
<p>I assume you have seen (or are aware of) Rebecca MacKinnon&#8217;s post on how China has blocked all Typepad blogs&#8230;</p>
<p>For more see <a href="http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2005/06/confirmed_all_t.html" rel="nofollow">http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2005/06/confirmed_all_t.html</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>ok, i think i gotcha there. i guess im not political enough to know (if theres such thing as being political enough). i DO know i need to know more of the issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, i think i gotcha there. i guess im not political enough to know (if theres such thing as being political enough). i DO know i need to know more of the issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>From the subject matter of the article, I wouldn&#039;t say that there is a conspiracy building against China. But in general, the western media are very anti-China. In my own small way, despite writing about this news, I wish to have the rest of the world view China in a positive light. What we do know is that (1) there are no laws in China against using such words, even on the Internet, yet people are &quot;removed&quot; for criticizing the government, and (2) western businesses are kowtowing to the Chinese government and are providing technology that censors the Chinese people.  Hence these so-called capitalist companies are undermining their democratic (or at least Enlightenment) values for the sake of profit, &lt;em&gt;at the expense of the Chinese people&lt;/em&gt;. Ultimately, this is Imperialism and exploitation, not just hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the subject matter of the article, I wouldn&#8217;t say that there is a conspiracy building against China. But in general, the western media are very anti-China. In my own small way, despite writing about this news, I wish to have the rest of the world view China in a positive light. What we do know is that (1) there are no laws in China against using such words, even on the Internet, yet people are &#8220;removed&#8221; for criticizing the government, and (2) western businesses are kowtowing to the Chinese government and are providing technology that censors the Chinese people.  Hence these so-called capitalist companies are undermining their democratic (or at least Enlightenment) values for the sake of profit, <em>at the expense of the Chinese people</em>. Ultimately, this is Imperialism and exploitation, not just hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madphilosopher.ca/2005/06/chinese-blogger-slams-microsoft/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>doncha think someone is setting up a conspiracy against china?  i remember hearing this story on global last week on how anyone in china couldnt use some words, like freedom or democracy.  i dont know. maybe its just me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doncha think someone is setting up a conspiracy against china?  i remember hearing this story on global last week on how anyone in china couldnt use some words, like freedom or democracy.  i dont know. maybe its just me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

